Participants Present in these experiments, was the same thought.

Participants knew the experiments requirements. They could be terminated whenever they pleased. But why didn’t they? It is familiar to know the feeling of acceptance. Present in these experiments, was the same thought. The participants went with the flow based on their social influences. They “shape every person’s practices, judgements, and belief” (Asch 352). In Zimbardo’s experiment on of his prisoners had a mental breakdown. At that point, Zimbardo said, “I am startled by the ease with whicH could turn off my sensitivity and concern for others for ‘a good cause”’ (Zimbardo 397). Here, Zimbardo realizes his actions towards the experiment. He was doing something bad and had prisoner number 819 to tell him of his wrong doing. In the end, the experiment did not last more than six days and was put to an end. However, who was more at fault? Was it Zimbardo – for conducting the experiment, or the guards – for carrying out their roles as “guards?” Those who carry out the orders were not at fault. People Relied on the authority figure to be responsible for their actions ‘”We do what we are told”‘ (Park380). In a way, Milgram’s experiment served as a reasonable excuse for the soldiers who took play during the Holocaust. Not just for the Nazi party, the Americans used Milgram’s results as an excuse during the Vietnam war, “I was following orders..” The author uses Mai Lai because American soldiers murdered a whole city during the Vietnam war. It’s pretty hard to think that there are potential killers amongst good people. The author uses a quote from Milgram’s experiment because . . . Lastly, Both had mistakes while they were being conducted. Both Messed with the participants’ minds, making them has depression, angst, or even having mental breakdowns. Based on the wrongdoings of Milgram’s experiment, he put stress on the teachers while they were pressing butttons. “..Milgram’s subjects could barely contain themselves as they moved up the shock board” (Parker 383).The experiment left people traumatized. It’s not easy putting up with something that potentially threatens the lives of others. Like i’ve previously asked, with these kinds of subjects, why didn’t they speak up? I understand that it’s hard to do so, however at the start of the experiment they were told that the could leave any time. Why didn’t they willingly leave once they felt pressured and uncomfortable? Well, that ties back to being accepted and following the authorian figure and not get into any consequence for not obeying.: “…section 4b in ethical standards of psychologists reads… :seriously consider the possibility of harmful after effects…” (baumrind 376). We can learn from them Both in Milgram and Zimbardo’s experiments demonstrate the struggle with ethics and societies role in it. People tend to obey orders from other people if they recognize their authority as morally right and/or legally based. This response to legitimate authority is learned in a variety of situations, for example in the family, school, and workplace.Although both experiments were a fail, the discovery of obedience effect on society will have significant applications in our future as well as in the lives of others. The significance of these two experiments in our lives.